/investor · for investors & financial institutions
Rank the technical merit of every asset in your portfolio.
AiRE gives investors, funds and lenders an independent, evidence-traced read on the exploration assets they hold or are weighing — which ground is genuinely prospective, where the technical risk actually sits, and which projects would gain the most from a CAGE-IN run.
The problem we solve
Exploration risk you’re carrying, but can’t see.
Portfolios get ranked by promoters’ decks, not by independent technical evidence. AiRE re-reads the data underneath each asset — the same multi-evidence, literature-cited engine behind every AiRE result — and tells you what the rocks actually support.
Portfolio-wide prospectivity review
We run the datasets behind each holding through CAGE-IN and return a comparable, evidence-traced prospectivity read across the whole book — one standard, applied to every asset.
Asset ranking & technical risk
Holdings ranked on technical merit, with the coverage disclosure naming exactly what each project's data could not test — so the risk is on the page, not buried in a footnote.
Where CAGE-IN adds the most
We flag the assets most likely to benefit from a full CAGE-IN run — where re-reading the data could grow a resource, define new targets, or de-risk the next raise.
What we review
Bring us the data room. We read what the deck won’t tell you.
The technical datasets
Geophysics, geochemistry, drilling, imagery and reports across the assets you hold or are evaluating — in whatever state they exist.
Independent and conflict-free
AiRE holds no position in your assets. The read is a technical opinion, not a promotion — the same discipline we apply to our own programs, with every weight cited and every gap named.
Confidential by default
NDA first; data rooms, not email attachments. Nothing appears in our materials without written consent, and credentials never live in our code or outputs.
A confidential, independent technical read — under NDA